Peer Review #3

After reviewing what others thought about peer reviw it seems that most of the students had the same opinion as myself. Mainly that the best function of wiki is that you are able to see an entires class' essays on one page. But it was difficult to know who was in which class. It was alo helpful to read other student's essays to get ideas for your own paper. You get to see what others are doing and what they came up with. It seems that many have complained about the kind of feedback they got. Mostly, I think that students want more comments about what ideas were or were not working. I think that people mostly give editing comments. Like if a comma is necessary or spelling is correct. It was also more difficult to edit with wiki. I think that studenst like being able to strike out certain areas and aadd notes and highlight. After using both systems, it seems clear that google docs is preferred. My opinion hasn't really changed and Ithink that many of the students would agree.